Judge will decide next month on status of McQueary whistleblower suit

Reported by: Chris Papst

Contributor: Nate Wardle
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/18 6:34 pm
In the latest in the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal, Penn State University is continuing to fight to dismiss a defamation and whistle blower lawsuit involving Mike McQueary.

The former assistant football coach is seeking millions in damages.

The former Penn State assistant coach was not in court Monday, but it appeared the judge was siding with him. During Monday's hearing Judge Thomas Gavin continually challenged university attorneys on why they felt this case should be thrown out.

Mike McQueary is suing the university for defamation, saying his reputation has been tarnished by the school; therefore his career as a football coach has been damaged. But the university disagrees, saying McQueary's lawyers fail to prove a link between damages and the university's actions, specifically actions by the schools' former president, Graham Spanier.

They also say McQueary is a limited public figure, which would change the burden of proof. The school's attorneys also predicted the whistle-blower defense will prove invalid, in time.

However, the judge seemed skeptical.

"We stand by our arguments in court as well as the legal documents filed in court," commented Penn State’s Attorney, Nancy Conrad.

The judge concluded the short 30-minute hearing by saying he will render a decision by late April.

Share
2 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WHP CBS 21 [Harrisburg]

Anonymous - 3/20/2013 6:06 PM
0 Votes
He is just as guilty as all of the rest. I mean cmon man. He witnesses a disgusting act, allegedly reports it and is so satisfied that justice has been served that he accepts a coaching position with the man that he witnessed committing the crime. He then freely tells the world that he saw the act and was fired for same once it all hit the fan. Why was he not telling the world before the news broke and before he accepted the coaching job. Was it a payoff to keep quiet or was he simply an inside informant to report any future law violations? I will let that one up to you, but I certainly have my opinion.

hazhaulr - 3/19/2013 8:19 AM
0 Votes
This bozo doesn't deserve anything but the same jail cell that Sandusky is in and the same sentence. He had the opportunity to stop the pervert and he was too stupid and too lazy to do anything about it. He had to go talk to his daddy. Come on. He is a grown man for god's sake. He had the youth and strenght to put a stop and and end to Sandusky. But he chose to do nothing. He is equal to Sandusky. I hope he pays his dues one day.

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.