NCAA clarifies trophy position; Penn State & bowls to decide fates

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 8/30/2012 12:51 am
HARRISBURG -- The future of Penn State's bowl game trophies may now be in limbo.

The NCAA tells CBS 21 News Sports Director Jason Bristol it has corrected it's position on the trophies, which were won during the period of 1998-2011; wins that were vacated as part of the NCAA sanctions against Penn State in the aftermath of the Jerry Sandusky scandal.

"As a correction to our statement last week, the NCAA did not specifically direct Penn State to return its trophies from vacated bowl wins as a part of its sanctions," said Christopher Radford, the NCAA's Associate Director of Public and Media Relations. "As such, Penn State and each bowl operator must decide what is appropriate. When a vacated championship involves an NCAA-administered game, the NCAA does require the school to return its trophy."

Penn State won six bowl games during that time: the Outback (1999, 2007), Alamo (1999, 2007), Orange (2006) and Capital One (2010), respectively.

Radford added that the NCAA administers 89 championships in 23 sports, but bowl games or BCS games are not run by the NCAA.

The NCAA originally told Bristol it "expects Penn State to return the trophies its won to the agencies or organizations which administer those bowls."

Bristol was the first to report the NCAA's positions.

Last month, the NCAA announced severe sanctions against Penn State in the wake of the Jerry Sandusky scandal, including vacating 111 of Joe Paterno's wins from 1998-2011.

Sandusky, a former Penn State assistant, was convicted in June of abusing 10 boys. The NCAA also punished Penn State with a four-year bowl ban and a $60 million fine.




Share
5 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of WHP CBS 21 [Harrisburg]

fuzzginator - 8/31/2012 11:21 AM
0 Votes
Why didn't we wait to do anything until after the trials of Curley and Schultz? The BOT & NCAA based their decisions on one report that is clearly flawed. We should hang on to those trophies until all due process is completed and we find out what REALLY happened. The NCAA's actions up to this point have been the quickest rush to judgment in history. The investigation of Sandusky is a criminal investigation, not one to be done by a collection of people chosen to serve on a voluntary board. Note, the NCAA has taken no action against North Carolina to date and their actions are much more appropriate for the NCAA to be handling than a criminal act. Emmert is a two faced clown who just couldn't wait to throw Penn State under the bus. Plus, if you put all of the BOT members together you would have great difficulty finding a spine. When are we going to see some leadership in the administration at PSU??

altlandf - 8/29/2012 9:22 PM
0 Votes
What I can't understand is why the alum or anyone else isn't taking the board of trustees and the crooks at the NCAA to court. Just how can the NCAA give PSU any santions when they are not following any of their own rules. They go off on the lies of the Freeh report. And they keep changing that also.

supportNAIA - 8/29/2012 6:24 PM
0 Votes
Wake up PSU administration and board!

supportNAIA - 8/29/2012 6:24 PM
0 Votes
This is taking political correctness to the NCAA degree!

supportNAIA - 8/29/2012 6:22 PM
0 Votes
Though the NCAA Says those trophies are a matter to be decided by PSU and the bowls, what sanctions would the bowls face should they decide PSU can keep them?

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.